Friday, June 5, 2009

BO's Speech, part 2

The previous post I was taking inserts of his speeches to demonstrate his love for Islam and how this man was no Christian. This speech I would say the most bold, but he knows he can confess anything and the media will spin it or cover it up at this point. How he takes all the evils that Islam has plagued the earth with and all the progress the West has done and whitewashes the Islamic evils and throws mud on the West. Yes, the West has had its share of evil acts, but we learned from them and moved forward. Islam lives in the 7th century. Basically showing this man is really a Muslim trying to disguise himself as a Christian and an American. Traits that conservatives saw through but the media covered up during the election and this latest speech demonstrated that.

For this part, I will go over what are his pie in the sky ideals that just have no basis in reality. Mainly one: Iran. He's showing how he's going to use policy of appeasement like Chamberlain did in the 1930's and actually has us believe that the Muslim world will believe it and become nice guys and have peace with us. Yea, and I can turn straw into gold.

Let me also address the issue of Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq was a war of choice that provoked strong differences in my country and around the world. Although I believe that the Iraqi people are ultimately better off without the tyranny of Saddam Hussein, I also believe that events in Iraq have reminded America of the need to use diplomacy and build international consensus to resolve our problems whenever possible. Indeed, we can recall the words of Thomas Jefferson, who said: "I hope that our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be."

Ok, so he doesn't believe in the war in Iraq. Fine. I didn't when we invaded either. I felt that Bush didn't make his case and later I was vindicated. However, we're there now and what are we going to do to make the region stable because it's not in any one's best interest, not even the Muslims there, to have the region become unstable and fall in to anarchy. He speaks of diplomacy and becoming great by not using our power. Well, diplomacy is a use of power but that's not what Jefferson meant. Jefferson thought the less we use our military, the greater we'll be perceived. Perhaps BO should had gone further in the man's term. He eventually went to war with Britain. Why? Because they didn't respect our sovereignty and attacked and kidnapped our citizens. Hummm, sounds familiar. Even he had a limited on diplomacy. Which is the point that BO never makes in his speech. What will he do when diplomacy fails? He doesn't even conceives it. Does he think diplomacy is all that high and mighty? That all it needs is the will of the politicians and it will succeed every time? Well, Hilter would had loved this man. Oh, wait, he had one. His name was Chamberlain who finally went to war after Hilter broke his word to him EIGHT times (North Korea has done it 21 times now, and we're still in the fetal position). With BO he would had developed the nuke before DC decided to get in to the war, but by then they would had been glowing in the dark. BO needed to seek the advice of Teddy Roosevelt (the OTHER Roosevelt): speak softy but carry a BIGGGGGGGG stick. All we're got from this speech is he wants to whimper and carry no stick. Will he go to war (other than Christians and Republicans with auto dealerships in his own country) only with international consensus? I doubt he'll ever attack a Muslim country (Afghanistan isn't Muslim but have a sort of Muslim cult).

As for Iran's Nuclear program, he states the following: This issue has been a source of tension between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. For many years, Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country, and there is indeed a tumultuous history between us. In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically-elected Iranian government. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has played a role in acts of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians. This history is well known. Rather than remain trapped in the past, I have made it clear to Iran's leaders and people that my country is prepared to move forward. The question, now, is not what Iran is against, but rather what future it wants to build.

I guess this man has been living a cave for the last 10 years. Iran wants a nuclear bomb and have stated so. They have stated that they intend to use it to wipe Israel off the map. They have said this unequivocally. I remember the T-shirt that said what part of no do you not understand. What part of "We want a nuclear bomb" does BO and the Democrats don't understand? Given the mindset of the sect of Islam of Shiitism, people should be screaming for war just as they were against Nazi Germany in the 1930's. In the Shite faith, they gain redemption by the pouring of blood. They have a festival every year were they go in the street, parading down trying to literally crack their skulls to bleed so they can gain redemption from Allah. One of their prophecies is that before the 12 Imam comes and brings back paradise to earth, there has to be a man made apocalypse that must be by a Shite. The Hitler of Iran believes he's that man. People don't know how cult members think, but they are suicidal as we've seen in the Islamic world. Life means nothing to them. If Iran gets the nuke, MAD goes out the window and all bets are off. We keep thinking it's a bluff and nothing will happen just like in the cold war. Because in the cold war, when the Soviets had a choice between their lives and their ideals they chose their lives. These maniacs will choose their ideals. To think otherwise is inviting a nuclear holocaust.

To show that he's living in fantasyland: I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the Treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.

Well, I like to know which country with the nukes are going to leave themselves open to attack by their enemies, other than the US, by disarming. That isn't going to stop Iran, rough nations, or terrorists from trying to develop them. The information is already out there. The genie is out on this one and there's no putting it back in. To believe we can disarm and the rest will follow suit is crazy. Who would enforce this ban? What, the non-nuked countries? HA! The nuclear armed countries? There's not suppose to be any, right? Nations will follow their own self interest and they're not going to disarm. This is pie in the sky thinking. The only people that are stupid, naive, crazy, or suicidal enough to try is the US and maybe Britian and France.
You can bet your sweet britches that Russia, China and North Korea sure won't. Why would Japan take it off the table (they don't have nukes but could build them in 2 weeks if they had to) with not one, but two threats just minutes away? You think Israel (one of the worse kept miltary secrets of all time is that Israel has nukes) are going to disarm you're really stupid or crazy. That will be a holocaust that only the Nazi's will rival. This policy is a one way path to a world wide nuclear holocaust.

BO has shown he's a man of the Muslim world and an enemy of the Western world. He's all for the progress of the Islamic world and the downfall of the West. He shows he has no will against the interests of our enemies and is completely against the ideas that founded and made our nation the envy of the world. Now his naivety, or his loyalty to his Muslim background, with Iran is a gambit that most people don't want to take. However, he has no desire to listen or believe. He's going to let Iran have their nuke because what can diplomacy accomplish here but to buy Iran time and spread their propaganda? This will back Israel into a corner because their survival, not only as a nation, but for every individual, is at stake. They know it will be their extinction if this continue. It's only a matter of time before they attack Iran, or worse yet, the US that will interfere with their survival by attacking Israel so to protect the stupid diplomacy that BO has planned. Then when that day comes, we will really learn about the wrath of God.

No comments: