Friday, November 27, 2009

Mindanao: the next killing fields?

There's a little known conflict going on that's getting very little notice by the news media, but goes to show what happens when Islam gets mixed in with politics and it's escalating. In a providence in Mindanao, there's an upcoming election for governor. The current governor, til recent events, was an ally of President Arroyo and her war on terror in the southern Island. That could change. Monday, a envoy was on the way with a wife of a rival Muslim family with the wife on the candidate (I wonder why he didn't do it himself. The reason will become clear: he's not an idiot) with several reporters were on their way to file his candidacy when they were ambushed by 100 armed men, shot, killed, mutilated and buried. Oh, not just the dismembered bodies, but the vehicles as well. It's come out it was a well planed and executed ambushed with government agencies involved since the civil agency's equipment was used to bury the cars and several trucks.

As I look at what's going on because elections, unlike what we take for granted here in the State, though I wonder for how much longer, rarely go without violence, especially in the Muslim dominated southern islands. Death and destruction are often tied together in Filipino elections, but this is something that goes beyond the norm as it was over a candidacy. Arroyo has suspended the governor suspected (as of this writing, has been formally arrested with) of being involved in the massacre. Troops are being sent, but if recent history is any indication, this is starting to be the beginning of a much larger conflict.

To spare everyone the bore of Filipino politics, they're mainly run by a handful of rich and power families. Their democracy is far from a government "by the People" as we like to think of ours here. In the southern providence, there are basically two rival Muslim families duking it out for political power not only of the south, but the entire country but they're mainly focused on Mindanao and the smaller southern islands. Now two Muslim families are acting like gangster ready to shoot it out. Remember, in Islam, they don't fight for liberty, freedom, or even benevolent or even malevolent advancement of their citizens, but for which thug gets to be in power. This fight is looking to be no different.

What's got my wife worried is that her mother (my mother-in-law) works for the family that just got massacred. We have inside information on what's brewing, and I sure hope I'm wrong, but there's talk of amassing "the boys" by the offending family, whether the governor is punished or not by the courts (which a murder investigation, unfortunately, can be bought off as little as a $1000) are going to go get retribution. Basically, this a Fatwa against the governor. What's worse is that the government of Mindanao is believed to be involved as the governor has been arrested and there news that more are on the way. There's an old adage: "Who do you call when the gang wear blue? (showing a bunch of police men beating a man). Well, you got the government going out against a family just because they seek to run against them. Now they're shooting and murdering people and don't care, especially journalists, get in the way.

As I see how this plays out, it all reminds me of the Rwandan massacre when two tribes, the 85% majority Hutu's went after the Tusis. A third party, the Belgians and later (laugh) the UN got involved. What ended up happening, the Hutu's first attacked small outposts (many ordered to surrender) and murdered the Belgians and they ran out. Then the UN was called but decided to be IMPARTIAL til the massacre was nearly over and then stepped in when it was too late. Once the Belgians were out, many leaving security zone, one a school with 2000 refugees (400 of them children) who left while Hutu soldiers were drinking beer and chatting "Hutu Power". Many pleaded with them to not abandon them. The panic got so bad, the Belgians had to shoot over the refugee's head to stem them away as they made their escaped. As they left the city, the Hutu's open fired with machine gun fire and grenades.

I don't see much different happening here. Arroyo already has shown her weakness in appeasing Muslims as she tried to give the Island over to the Moro's. The supreme court ruled the agreement unconstitutional and ordered the troops back in just in the nick of time. As the Moro's were taking the lands promised, they were starting the executions and be headings of the Catholics living in the towns. Now these same Muslims are on one side in this conflict and they're willing to do worse to their own kind over political rule. Think what they'll do to infidels in the way in this conflict. Arroyo has been wanting to get the troops out of the conflict which has been savage in it's brutality and fighting as the Moro's and their more vicious cousin, the Abu Sayyaf (father of the sword) have fought off the Filipino military. Should these two families start to attack the Catholic Filipino Army, I fear she'll call it a domestic problem and leave them to fight it out just like in Rwanda. After all, she's allied with one of them. She's cut it off for now, but she's trying to change the government to a parliamentary system and buy 8 more years in office (she'll have to do it by the end of 2010 when her 2nd and final term runs out) and need money and political capital to gain that victory (though it's failed now 3 times) and losing southern support will be the final nail in the coffin.

As with Rwanda, the world media and political bodies did nothing to stop the massacre. So it is today. Most aren't reporting it. With Obama in office, even the US won't even hint at interference, though two terrorist organization tied to Al-Quida are involved (hence one difference between McCain and Obama). That's going to leave 15 million Filipinos (and God knows how many more if this spreads out to the nearby islands, especially Cebu) in the cross hair and in the cross fire. 62 people were butchered for no more than one Muslim thug that wants to keep his power. Who knows how many more, with government backing, will be sacrificed in this conflict. What's worse, if both side weaken, there are several more that would be more than willing and tied to these terrorist organization, that would take their place, ally or attempt coups and intensify the conflict even more. God I hope I'm wrong. If not, my advice for my in-laws: GET OUT NOW! As 20th century history has taught, this will get ugly fast and there will be no Calvary, until the carnage is over. As Islamic conflict has demonstrated in the past, this has the potential to make the Cambodian killing fields look Rosy in comparison.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

More leftist stupidity from California.

I just got done reading over two conserversial decision that doesn't typified the leftist mentality, nothing will. The first is the TV ban that's going to go in effect. Seems that the state with billions in shortfall, rising crime, increasing illegal immigration and crumbling infrastructure has nothing better to do than address these problems. No, they have time to go after a major scrooge of society, though for different reason I think, TV usage. Never mind that we, as a society spend too much time on the tube. I prefer not to watch much because so many of the shows are just plain an insult to my intelligence. However, the state feels that our TV's use too much electricity and unless they meet extreme energy usage regulations, they're going to fine or perhaps arrest those that use tubes that suck too much juice. Basically, they're going after those that have plasma, high def, and big screen tv users.

Government is suppose to protect life and property, not regulate what and how we live our lives or use our property, unless it's effecting another's use of the said rights. If I'm willing to pay for the power to have a 60 inch HD TV to watch the football game or the Superbowl, then what right does the government have telling me otherwise. Much less taking more of what little money I have left over to punish me or force my, by use of the gun, to take my freedom away just because the set I used. This nanny statism is getting way out of hand. What's next, what food i can eat because I have to cook it and my stove is electric? What car I can drive because THEY feel it uses too much gas? What color of skin I can have because it offends too many of their racist constituents? This is getting crazy and should concern us all.

The other is the UC increase of the student fees. Times are hard for most of us, and I'm going to say most because what I'm learning about this has me so ticked off, it's doubling my blood pressure and my wife feels my pressure is high enough already. The UC, and I'm sure secondary education facilities across the state will follow suit, to increase fees 32% next school year. For liberals that can't do math, and most can't, that's nearly a 1/3rd increase or one additional dollar added for every three dollars paid this year. Add the 20% increase that was accessed this year and we're looking to double education costs in nearly 3 years and that's just the "tuition". That doesn't include room, board, and books. I've missed a semester of COMMUNITY COLLEGE because of this increase. Given how critically in the global economy that education is to be successful, making that education all the more expensive and complicated is going to make us more competitive how? Worse yet is the reason why.

Inflation for the three years in question is going to total, assuming no mega inflation next year, about 9% to 12%, yet education expenses are going up 52%. I've had basic economics and this doesn't make sense. Add that half the classes have been cancelled, and some majors are no longer being offered, what justifies this tax on students? One word: administration. When I was teaching at the public high school, the corruption from the administration was so blatant and egregious, I couldn't believe how there wasn't a revolt but I know most of the public doesn't really understand or even know how bad or deep the theft and corruption is. Administration at the K-12 is around 100K and they don't get laid off or have salary cuts, but teachers do. Student's do. At UC it's nearly 300 to 400K and that doesn't include perks and yet they're not getting laid off or having cuts. But who are? The professors and students. Sort of makes you wonder why we have an education system when it those that make getting an education possible are the ones getting cut while those that just run the institutions are laughing to the bank.

This is typical liberal nonsense. They think by making people pay more, they'll get more revenue when in fact far more people than the increase, in this case, more than 32% just aren't going to go and the total revenue will drop worse and guess how they'll try to overcome that shortfall. You guessed it, more fee increases and cost cuts other than administration. This is typical of liberal thinking. More increases of "revenue" will mean more money. This shows a lack of understanding of economics. Something these so called university system are suppose to be teaching, but I have a feeling they're getting the socialist version. You see, supply and demand aren't linear and even if it was, this model that the UC regents are using will just make them break even. When costs go up a percentage, the demand doesn't go down by the same percentage, but by an exponential relationship so the total demand will go from 62% of those interested being able to afford it to .62 squared which, for those again that don't understand math, is .3844 or 38.44% which is a decline of demand of 45.2%, so with an increase in fees, you lose 45.2% of enrollment and you're in the hole of 13%. This isn't going to strengthen our UC system, it's going to decimate it. Given what some of our grads lack of understanding of economics, our constitutional republic, or just plain historical facts, I'm not sure they're learning much anyways.

In the end, the government just going to make us more ignorant, more reliant on them, and worse gain more power and interference into our lives. I don't know about you, but the model that California is displaying should make every other state re-evaluate their thinking on socialism. But given the political body and the ignorant voting blocs in our country, I doubt seriously that they can even see what's really going on.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Obama, Afghanistan, and the Art of War.

With some time on my hands, I took the time to watch a historical critique of Sun Tsu and his book, The Art of War. I've heard about this man's work from time to time, but never took a serious look at what it was that he was teaching and why. As I was learning about the man's writings and their implication in the battlefields that have come afterwards, I couldn't but help to take note of our current war on terror and all the mistakes that are being made. Now I have a better understanding of what they really are and why they're so devastating. The war that comes to mind that has all that Sun Tzu would condemn is the War in Afghanistan.

One of the first rules in Art of War is that you must define what your goals are and seek to accomplish them. Not so much the military goals but the political ones. War is a political tool to be used only in critical situation. If one doesn't define the goal that is to be achieve, then as the author said, "First find the objective that you wish to accomplish and then fight. You fight with clarity and valor. The enemy that fights then defines his objective fights in confusion and darkness. Sounds a lot like what's going on in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The Iraq policy is pretty clear at this point, turn tail and run. Given that we have no truly define objective, perhaps that's not the worse thing in the world. The fight in Afghanistan is proving to be more allusive since BO made it one of his platforms during his campaign that the real war on terror is in Afghanistan. The problem is he didn't defined what that threat is or how to eradicate it. Sun Tzu said, if the orders are unclear, then it's the fault of the general, if they are clear, it's the fault of the soldiers. Well, it's clear that it's the fault of the general, or in the case of our constitutional republic, the Commander-in-Chief. Now we're left with a quagmire with no clear objective as to when it will end. This is leading to another lesson: No nation has ever benefit from an extensive war.

Wars have bankrupt nations and destroyed empires, and not just the ones that lost. As we sit around and let our men become target practice for the Taliban while being body guards to a corrupt and divided government in Kabul, the cost in men, material, and money continues to rise. When a war is fought, it's to be fought to an end. There doesn't seem to be one other that stooges for corrupt Muslim thugs who continue in their quest to which thug gets to be in charge. With Bush, we had enough of a lack of leadership. With an even weaker commander, things are get getting worse. This is leading to another problem that's becoming clear and another violation in the art of war (I'm paraphrasing here because I don't remember the exact wording): leaders need to leave their generals alone.

Obama puts in his own guy to determine what's need to win the war there and when he comes back asking for more troops, Obama does exactly the opposite of what a winning commander does: intervenes. Basically, he tells him to shut up. This is what cost General Lee the battle of Gettysburg. When it was clear that fighting uphill against the Union was suicide and the more prudent tactic was to go around and draw them out from the advantage the Union had, Lee, three times said no. Had he listen to his commanders and let them do what they needed, the battle would have had a different results and DC would had been open to assault, perhaps taking Lincoln and obtaining a major political victory for the Confederacy, but Lee continue to intervene and lost 2/3rd of his army. It was the last time the Confederacy ever remained a threat politically and militarily to the Union and Lincoln gained the biggest political win of his presidency and went on to win the war. Now we have a Commander that doesn't want to listen to his own guy that he put in and wants to continue with what isn't working.

Perhaps one shouldn't be surprised by this. Obama doesn't know much of anything, much less about how to fight a war. Given his radical views, hatred of America, and socialistic objective, the war bleeding us to death would work in favor of his objective. He is taking one lesson quite well: maintain the moral high ground. This is the pysdo-arguments that he uses to maintain his political capital on the home front. Health care, Cap and Trade, the Nationalization of our industries, it's all done in the guise that it's to save the economy, the environment, to save and maintain the health of the country's citizens. However, his victory in this front is starting to crack as more and more people are opposing him. His political capital is being used up quickly as he's gone from an approval rating of nearly 80% to less than 50%. If he's weak at home and abroad, however, it won't be long before the rest of the country will follow unless leadership, especially in the Congress, is changed. Otherwise, as history has proven this man's wisdom repeatedly, we will suffer a huge and utter defeat and our republic will die.

Friday, November 13, 2009

The lessons of Fort Hood.

I found this letter on the K.O.O.K. Manifesto. A letter that should be spread by every freedom loving Americans, I mean the real ones, not the fake one that do so for political expediency or as a Charlton undermining our republic to those that want to destroy. I'm going to list what was in the letter with my own commentary in green.

The letter goes as Following:

Author, retired Lt. Col. Allen West is running for U.S. Congressman Ron Klein's seat in Florida. Attached is his article regarding the shootings at Ft. Hood, Texas.Please take a few minutes to read what he wrote.


“Tragedy at Ft Hood” Lieutenant Colonel Allen B West (US Army, Ret) This past Thursday 13 American Soldiers were killed and another 30 wounded at a horrific mass shooting at US Army installation, Ft Hood Texas. As I watched in horror and then anger I recalled my two years of final service in the Army as a Battalion Commander at Ft Hood, 2002-2004. My wife and two daughters were stunned at the incident having lived on the post in family housing. This man isn't just an outsider looking in. This man knows what it like to live on the base, what the purpose of the base and what base life is like. This give credibility as we're talking to someone on the inside. A military installation, whether it is Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine, or Coast Guard, is supposed to be a safe sanctuary for our Warriors and their families. It is intended to provide a home whereby our “Band of Brothers and Sisters” can find solace and bond beyond just the foxhole but as family units. A military installation is supposed to be a place where our Warriors train for war, to serve and protect our Nation. Apparently with the latest group of Socialists it isn't. Remember, liberals believe militarys cause war, not corrupt politicians.

On Thursday, 5 November 2009 Ft Hood became a part of the battlefield in the war against Islamic totalitarianism and state sponsored terrorism. Good choice of words here because that's exactly what happened here. It wasn't that some dude just snapped because he had a toothache, though a terrorist doesn't need a reason to terrorized, but a toothache is just as good as a reason, right? There may be those who feel threatened by my words and would even recommend they not be uttered. Like Poloski, Reid, Bin Laden, ACORN, Dick (Turban) Durbin, The Saudi Royal Family, and CAIR. To those individuals I say step aside because now is not the time for cowardice. Our Country has become so paralyzed by political correctness that we have allowed a vile and determined enemy to breach what should be the safest place in America, an Army post. We have become so politically correct that our media is more concerned about the stress of the shooter, Major Nidal Malik Hasan. Please Mr. Terrorist, don't kill us. We'll let you have whatever you want. Terrorist: ok, we want you dead. The misplaced benevolence intending to portray him as a victim is despicable. A victim of his own pervert lust for blood as mandated by his radical doctrine. The fact that there are some who have now created an entire new classification called; “pre-virtual vicarious Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)” is unconscionable. Who comes up with this psychobabble? This is not a “man caused disaster”. It is what it is, an Islamic jihadist attack. We have seen this before in 2003 when a SGT Hasan of the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) threw hand grenades and opened fire into his Commanding Officer’s tent in Kuwait. That's being blamed on Traumatic Stress Disorder. We have seen the foiled attempt of Albanian Muslims who sought to attack Ft Dix, NJ. Recently we saw a young convert to Islam named Carlos Bledsoe travel to Yemen, receive terrorist training, and return to gun down two US Soldiers at a Little Rock, Arkansas Army recruiting station. We thwarted another Islamic terrorist plot in North Carolina which had US Marine Corps Base, Quantico as a target. What have we done with all these prevalent trends? Nothing. What we see are recalcitrant leaders who are refusing to confront the issue, Islamic terrorist infiltration into America, and possibly further into our Armed Services. When you have a president that once wrote in a book, "Should a conflict occur between the United States and the Islamic world, I will have to side with the Muslims every time." Why wouldn't you be more embolden? You know he, as well as the media, are on your side.

Instead we have a multiculturalism and diversity syndrome on steroids. Major Hasan should have never been transferred to Ft Hood, matter of fact he should have been Chaptered from the Army. He should had been arrested for making terrorist threats that, unfortunately, was carried out. His previous statements, poor evaluation reports, and the fact that the FBI had him under investigation for jihadist website posting should have been proof positive. However, what we have is a typical liberal approach to find a victim, not the 13 (14) and 30 Soldiers and Civilian, but rather the poor shooter. Typical Liberal mentality: pass by affirmative action and then blame the victims should damage occur. A shooter who we are told was a great American, who loved the Army and serving his Nation and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) stating that his actions had nothing to do with religious belief. Uh, if he loved America and the Army so much, why did he shoot it up? Oh wait, I'm using that evil and untrustworthy logic again. Sorry, my mistake. Anyone using anything CAIR, a TERRORIST CIVIL RIGHTS ORGANIZATION says as being fact is proving you have no mind or will. We know that Major Hasan deliberately planned this episode; he did give away his possessions. A classic sign of suicidal intent. He stood atop a table in the confined space of the Soldier Readiness Center shouting “Allahu Akhbar”, same chant as the 9-11 terrorists and those we fight against overseas in the Iraq and Afghanistan theaters of operation. I don't care what the literal translation says, it really means "I'm going to kill you."

No one in leadership seems willing to sound the alarm for the American people; they are therefore complicit in any future attacks. Our Congress should suspend the insidious action to vote on a preposterous and unconstitutional healthcare bill and resolve the issue of “protecting the American people”. That would require them to put the American people before their political agenda and that's just not feasible. The recent incidents in Dearborn Michigan, Boston Massachusetts, Dallas Texas, and Chicago Illinois should bear witness to the fact that we have an Islamic terrorism issue in America. And don’t have CAIR call me and try to issue a vanilla press statement; they are an illegitimate terrorist associated organization which should be disbanded. Why that saying all that is evil always seems to be defended by liberals. This demonstrates the deinal liberals are in about who our enemies really are and what's really motivate them. If one can't affirm the cause, then they can't attack the root but keep reacting and treating the symptons.

We have Saudi Arabia funding close to 80% of the mosques in the United States, one right here in South Florida, Pompano Beach. Are we building churches and synagogues in Saudi Arabia? Are “Kaffirs” and “Infidels” allowed travel to Mecca? So much for peaceful coexistence. Saudi Arabia is sponsoring radical Imams who enter into our prisons and convert young men into a virulent Wahabbist ideology….one resulting in four individuals wanting to destroy synagogues in New York with plastic explosives. Thank God the explosives were dummy. They are sponsoring textbooks which present Islamic centric revisionist history in our schools. We must recognize that there is an urgent need to separate the theo-political radical Islamic ideology out of our American society. Because with "friends" like these we're not going to need enemies. Ok, cliche, but I had to get it out. Our government is complacent in letting our enemies run around at will and promoting brainwashing and propaganda in our school under the guise of history. We must begin to demand surveillance of suspected Imams and mosques that are spreading hate and preaching the overthrow of our Constitutional Republic……that speech is not protected under First Amendment, it is Sedition and if done by an American, Treason. Why that's racial profiling and religious presecution and that's just down right unamerican. Never mind they're really a death cult and want to destroy America. There should not be some 30 Islamic terrorist training camps in America that has nothing to do with First Amendment, Freedom of Religion. Why are such camps uncriminalized? Because they're Muslim? What if a Christian or Jewish sect had camps like that? Yea, that's what I thought. The Saudis are not our friends and any American political figure who believes such is delusional. When tolerance becomes a one way street it certainly leads to cultural suicide. That's self explanatory, but who said the Liberals weren't suicidal, culturally or with our lives? We are on that street. Where can I get off? What? I'm not allowed to? When did this happen? Liberals cannot be trusted to defend our Republic, because their sympathies obviously lie with their perceived victim, Major Nidal Malik Hasan. Or any other antiamerican psychopath like Mao, Castro, Chavez, or Ayers.

I make no apologies for these words, and anyone angered by them, please, go to Ft. Hood and look into the eyes of the real victims. Frankly, do us all a favor and moved the Middle East and declare a jihad against another Islamic sect. The tragedy at Ft Hood, Texas did not have to happen. Consider now the feelings of those there and on every military installation in the world. Consider the feelings of the Warriors deployed into combat zones who now are concerned that their loved ones at home are in a combat zone. According the left, they were terrorist about to be deployed to murder innocent Muslims. Never mind their man is giving the orders. Ft Hood suffered an Islamic jihadist attack, stop the denial, and realize a simple point. That would take courage, logic, and empathy things the liberals completely lack.

The reality of your enemy must become your own.. Steadfast and Loyal, Lieutenant Colonel Allen B West (US Army, Ret)

The gist of his argument is that as long as we're in denial about who are enemies are and why, we're open to more attacks, more assaults, and will be destroyed from within as those at Fort Hood learned as it was "one of their own" that did so much damaged. These Islamic cells are like cancer in the body politics and they're starting to spread. If left unchecked, like a cancer they will grow, becoming bigger, more aggressive, more intensive, more damaging and creating more damage. One man, one nut job, one jihadist was able to go onto the biggest military base in the world, of the most powerful military on the planet with the most firepower in human history and managed to kill 13 (14 if you count the unborn child from one of he women soldiers) and wound 30. Most Americans don't want to think about, but if one determined psychopathic enemy can do this much damage was is suppose to be one of the most secured places on the planet, what can a small group do at a school, mall, bus station, airport, name a soft target? We got a political body more interested in defending the murders and assault the gun used. Our government has no real interest in protecting the citizens which is their primary duty. Our government has grown so big and become so corrupt that the main purpose, to protect life and property is not only deluded, but in too many cases are being assaulted by the very institutions that was empowered to provide the protection.

What's worse, the next assault on our white blood cells of our society is about to begin as the terrorist being held in Gitmo are going to be transfer to New York for trial in civilian courts. If you think the Fort Hood is bad, wait til the consequences from this materialized. It's clear what the goal of this Muslim Manchurian Candidate administration is: to declare the war on terror an imperialistic scam and acquit the Islamic terrorists. Nobody with a brain can see how these guys are going to be tried without exposing our secrets and personnel in the trail and given how things are done in the battlefield are done in contrast with civilian streets, I can hear the defense lawyers (from CAIR no doubt), but your honor, he was water boarded. We've seen what liberalism has reaped at Fort Hood. The contempt and lack of fear of the American government reprisal, if you can call it that, after these trails are done, Fort Hood will pale in comparison. All I can do right now is fear that I am wrong and hope I don't express that ever hated statement of mine: I hate it when I'm right.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

If a conflict occurs between the united states and the Islamic World, I must take the side of the Muslims everytime.

There's a line from an audio book I listen to that I often quote. The reason is abundantly clear, especially after the Fort Hood Massacre. For if anyone hasn't a clue where I heard this from, it's from Barak Obama and it came right out of his mouth for it was his audio reading from Audacity of Hope. So many people are shocked and awed, as well as grossly disappointed in his handling of the Fort Hood Massacre, but given this was written in his autobiography, is it really a surprise? Frankly, I expected that kind of speech from this Muslim Manchurian Candidate and the attempt by the White House, the executive offices, and the media to white wash this making the terrorist the victim comes, again, expectantly.

I wanted to wait things out to see how things played before commenting on this horrible act of terrorism on our own troops. What is happening now with the blame being from traumatic stress disorder, though he's never been deployed, to American bigotry towards Muslim to, I kid you not from the mayor of one of our most violent cities, on our love of guns. Terrorism isn't going to be used as a cause though it's clear to anyone with a brain that functions that this was a planned terrorist attack on what turned out to be a soft target since the base had no weapons stored. This is the first disturbing fact about this assault. No guns, on the biggest military base in the world from the most powerful military with the most firepower in the world. You see, the base has a gun ban. I don't know about you, but having a military base without weapons makes as much sense as having a submarine with a screen door, or a warship with no ammo in her guns (like on the Cole), or a police force that can't arrest criminals like in San Fransisco if you're an illegal alien. After 9 months of BO, we've now been hit with terrorism, though it's not called that now, 3 times while after 911 with Bush, we weren't hit at all for 7 years+ after the attack. This isn't a surprise and if we don't wake up soon, it's only going to get worse.

First, take the statement of the tile as quoted from BO's book. With this kind of mentality in the White House, how often are we going to define the real danger: radical Islam? As he stalls the wars in Iraq (which is basically over, it's a matter of how to get the troops out of there without all hell breaking loose) and Afghanistan where the Taliban is making a come back while he chastise his commander, what strong stance is he going to take against those that murder in the name of Allah? Given all the apology tours that basically told these Muslim countries that support these animals and their cheers of "YES YES YES!" , it was Islamic code for "you have me in your pocket". It's clear anyone that murders and commits acts of terrorism against American Citizens aren't going to labeled as the Terrorist as they are, but will be protect as a victim of an oppressive American society. Just look at Napalitano's reactions in UAE. She's warming against any backlash against Muslims in the US. This tells two things. One, that they think Americans are like the Muslims and will seek blood. Two, that they are going to protect the terrorists and their supporters against anyone that are willing to fight back against this scrooge of society. BO isn't on your side if you're a target of these monsters.

Another sign that tells tales of our Muslim Manchurian Candidate. Take a look at the Islamic Blogs, especially one from New York, where 3 of the 911 hijackers worshipped and this animal was a frequent visitor, that praise this killer as a hero and how it's every Muslim's duty to kill as many of the troops, and Americans that support the war on terror, as possible. In fact, it states the only purpose a Muslim should join the military is for the express purpose to murdering the troops and anyone that doesn't, is a traitor and should be punished. How is this site even up? How is this not hate speech? How is this not a conspiracy to commit mass murder? Simple, it's because a Muslim said it. I can only imagine if a Christian, Jew, New Ager, name another religion, had said the same thing what Napolitano would be doing. In fact, let me go to a Muslim nation and commit the same act, I wonder the consequences will be? Some how, due process doesn't come to mind.

Now the media and the white house don't want us jumping to conclusions. That's not what he did when a racist professor made a fool out of him by concluding white cops act stupidly. Totally different when the abortion dr. Dillder was murdered. However, if an Islamic, with a FBI investigation going, Facebooks his intentions, spew Islamic hatred and propaganda to his Patience's and he wants us to believer there's no reason to believe this isn't terrorism. What reason is there to believe this ISN'T terrorism? Coming up with every liberal psychobabble to justify his action. Considering this man was a psychiatrist , someone tell me what they're teaching in our med schools. Makes me wonder who will be giving us care if BO's health care bill becomes law. Muslims that will indoctrinate us? Muslim that can kill us on the operating table or improper medication and just say oops? Seeing this man was a psychiatrist and a crazy one at that, it makes me wonder.

What should worry us most is if one nut job can do this much damage at a military base, what can a number of well organized psychopaths do at a school (which have no security), a mall (that have Rent a Cop I wouldn't trust to be able to take candy from a baby, much less a weapon from a terrorist), Bus stops (again, no security), or just in the streets in general? Let BO be clear, if we're attacked by the Muslims in our country, he will side with the Muslims. After all, DHS has told us as much as they're going to be sure there's no backlash against the Muslims. After all, the media was sure quick to cover this up. After all, BO was quick to come out and ask us not jump to (faulty?) conclusions. And it's clear from the mosque that this animal attended that such Muslim will be held in high regards and any Muslim that doesn't do likewise is an Apostate and deserving of execution. Given how we're not going to have any protection from our own government, does Obama's quote sound like rhetoric or the true face of the man behind the curtain?

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

The dangers of blind faith in socialism and modern liberalism.

In the animated feature, “The Prince of Egypt,” Miriam breaks into a song of praise following Israel’s deliverance. The song is entitled “When You Believe,” and includes these words: “There can be miracles, when you believe…. Who knows what miracles you can achieve, when you believe…Just believe…Gotta believe….” I remember when I saw this and though what irony. This signifies what's wrong with modern Christianity, but far more dangerous, is the danger apparent with socialists in general.

In the movie, as well as the Bible, Moses, a murder and renegade Israelite at the time, had a valid claim when he asked God what to tell them. It was at this point that God told him to throw out his staff and it turned into a snake and have him pick up the snake by its tail and it turned back into a staff. It would be this act that will tell them that his message came from Him. He didn't say to him go and tell and then he'll give the evidence. The biggest misconception about faith is that it's holding to unproven truths. The reality is that you have trust in the truth to come based on the evidence of the past. It's a continuation of trust based on past evidence. Trust in things unproved based on NO evidence is blind faith and that's what many churches teach and why they're declining in numbers. However, liberals take blind faith to an all new level.

To give an example, let's take the creationism vs. evolution debate. Christian do no good to their cause because of their stubborn stance that the world was created in 7 literal 24 hour days. This contradicts all scientific evidence. It also contradicts the Bible. In Genesis, a day isn't necessary defined as 24 hour days. It literally means an era, an eon, indefinite amount of time. It's best translation would had been era. So in the first era of time, God created the heavens and earth. This could be 24 hours, it could be a billion years. The Bible is filled with these metaphors. Even the apostles knew this because three times they had to asked him what he meant by "3 days" that he would resurrect from the dead and he told them three rising and setting of the sun or 3 24 hour days. This had led Christians that man was created out of dust in literally one 24 hour day, but that's not the context of the word used. The bible give what God did and why He did, but not the how. This just could be the how. We have the evidence of his creation as we see everything around us. We're given the why, so we take on this evidence that the why is true and the what came about from his "creations". The other misconception is the world "created" used. It literally means "is creating" or an ongoing cycle of creating. It's not I've created and I'm done. If so, explain Eve who was created after the 7th day of rest. It's an ever ongoing project.

Why would God have ongoing creation when he has the knowledge to just "poof" do it. It was to serve as how we were to live out our lives "in his image". As He creating, we create, test, improve and advance. This method of creating has served as an example that we have been following since the birth of history. Perhaps there would complications to his desire to create us in his image should he just poof things by magic as it said. From what evidence I've seen, his method has worked out pretty well, so I'll go on faith that He knows what he's doing. It's man I question.

This lead me to the liberalism and their faiths. They seem to have a great deal of blind faith in ideals and methodologies that have been proven to be wrong, false, or just plain ineffective. The biggest is their faith in socialism. Modern liberals believe that if everything was socialized, was put in a collective and equally distributed to the people, we all be living in utopia with no jealousy, envy, or class warfare. All the darkness in man's heart would be cured and we all can live happily ever after. The problem is that this blind faith of a utopia through socialism ignores all the evidence from the attempts from the last 150 years. Everywhere on the planet that it has been tried, it not only has failed miserably to provide even the basic necessities for survival much less blissful amount of property and material gains, but has led to some of the biggest massacres in human history, the biggest being Mao's Cultural Revolution that murdered at least 20 million of his own citizen and most likely, if you count those that disappeared who's fates are unknown, 60 million. Think of it this way, the entire population of California and Texas being murdered. That's just one example. Then there's Stalin's agricultural collectivism that starved 20 million Ukrainians. That was just from one of his policies. Who knows how many during WW2 and the cold war with his secretive society. Pol Pot's killing fields that saw the deaths of 2 million of a country that had 6 million total population. How many South Vietnamese were butchered. We know of a million, but the numbers are really unknown and this was after our troops left. Castro's revolution saw the imprisonment of what? A few million. And those that are still putting faith that socialism can bring about a Utopian society if just the right people would take charge, William's Ayers, remember him? The family friend of our current President said to bring about the proper socialist revolution in the United State, 30 million people would need to be killed to ensure it's proper installment. Seems the evidence is that socialism is a recipe for mass murder.

Let's take a look at the economic results from those said socialist countries. Russia became completely bankrupt after just 71 years. China is prospering, but only after they allow their citizens to have free markets just as long as they maintain control after the Tienanmen Square incident. So other words, China is a socialist country, but have a capitalist market system and frankly, the reason they're killing us economically is because they have more free markets than we do. That, and the slave prison labor I'm sure helps. Cuba is the 2nd poorest Caribbean country behind Haiti. Ukraine is still trying to recover from their "glory" days. Russia has the largest mafia on the planet running what's left of their economy. They still have to wait in line a day to buy a chicken and that's if they're lucky to get one. North Korea needs foreign aid to avoid starving to death. So, socialist think that they can get the right people to control the economy, everything will be equally prosperous. What lunacy.

The evidence shows that faith in socialism is a recipe for death, mass murder, and economic suicide. The only socialist country that is prospering economically is doing so using a free market economy and leaving it alone. No man can control the economy because they can't react to the market changes fast enough. But keep having faith.

What's really disconcerting is what we do put faith in. The green movement is by far the worse, behind the socialist, in their blind faith. They have compete faith in "mother earth". That if they respect the trees, animals, air, fish in the sea, you name it, nature will return a bountiful return. The problem is nature respects no one. Nature does what it does. Create storms, occasionally floods or droughts. All the nature worship won't change a thing. This faith that man can affect nature by acts of worship is just nonsense. That's what is motivating the Global cooling. . . I mean Global Warming. . . I mean Climate Change movement. The evidence shows that cooling and warming happens cyclically. However, greens, or nature worshippers, have faith that nature is a deity that can be appease with our self destruction or just becoming one with nature. Show me a nature worshipping society that ever prosper? They don't because nature is no Deity.

The worse that comes from modern liberalism is moral relativism. They have blind faith in that all morals, rules, ideas are all equal in value or that they have no value. That one person's rules and values, as well as cultures, are equal. There there is no good or bad, right or wrong, or as most often stated, no black and white, just shades of grey. Basically, there there are no good or bad ideas. They believe that everything is equal in value both morally and consequentially. So one man's theft is another man's entitlement. So homosexual sex is no different from heterosexual sex. Though societies that embraced such an ideal all died out for a good reason: they couldn't procreate. That's why adultery, fornication, polygamy have been outlawed because it created problems in society that lead to poverty. Now we state every idea is equal in it's value. Well, we can equally value them all we want, the fact is that they don't have equal consequences. Some consequences lead to societal break downs because populations die out (which some would like to see happen as they see over population to be the end of us all), if I don't want to work and farm my land, then I would be facing starvation. In fact, make it so the productive is penalized while the unproductive are rewarded lead to famines because no one would work the farms. Just look at what's going on in Zimbabwe to see the results of that policy. Yet liberals have faith that now it will be different because it's the United States or we're more technologically advanced, or just because we want it to be. well, technology isn't everything and having no moral or ethical codes for their use can lead to disastrous consequences. If I drive my car into a playground of children will lead to tragedy no matter if it feels good to me so it's morally correct for me to do so. If I shoot a gun to a person head, they will die no matter what moral code I rationalize with. Using fire to cook my food is a good idea while doing so in an open forest is a bad idea no matter how I choose to define it. Trusting that a news report will be accurate from Fox news is a good (or at least a better) basis while trusting one from MSNBC you do so at your own risk. Having faith in something with evidence to supports my continued trust in it, like gravity will pull, electricity will power my computer or that my car will start when I turn on the ignition (usually) are good ideals to have faith in. Having faith in ideas, morals, or people without evidence to back up that trust or any basis for that trust at all is not only a really bad idea, it's a one way ticket to self destruction.

If one wants a prime example, just look at our President. I've listen to his audio books and heard from his own mouth and knew what he represented: racism, statism, socialism, class warfare, elitism, Islam, terrorism, etc. The man had no accomplishments to his name, never worked a job other than a lawyer for ACORN or met a payroll, nor had any experience at the executive level, associated with terrorist and socialists, yet voters had blind faith that he would bring world peace, respect to America, the end of the financial crisis, end unemployment, end class warfare, end racism, balance the budget, pay their mortgage, never worry about putting gas in their tank, and worse of all, bring us a Utopian society. He spewed the same disproved plans for that utopia and now what have we got. Given how his poll numbers are dropping faster than a thermometer at the South Pole, seems that people are realizing their faith have been misplaced. Thus is the peril of blind faith.