Thursday, December 31, 2009

Message to Liberals.

I don't get too many comments. To date I haven't yet posted one comment of the few that I do get from liberals for one simple reason: they have no substances. So far I've been called a jackass, though that the symbol the Democrat Party uses so perhaps they're complimenting me, stupid, uneducated, evil, fascist, racist (of course) and a few other I can't repeat because unlike them, I try to be civilized. As the new year begins, I thought I put a few lessons so liberals can get a lesson on what it takes to get posted on a conservative man's blog.

Lesson #1: Refer to what post you're commenting on. Not once did the liberals that took to insulting me ever told me what it was they're ticked off about. It's hard for me, a stupid jackass in their opinions, to know what you're angry about because most of you are angry all the time over nothing or irrelevant things. Yea, my spelling isn't the greatest nor is my typing at time, but to go on a rant over that or a profane tirade without telling me why, well I can't respond. Unlike liberals, if you can demonstrate I have some fact wrong or logically why my line of thinking is flawed, I'll be the first to tell you, but first tell me what is I'm supposedly wrong about. So unless I know what you're referring to, I can't respond.

Lesson #2: Using profanity and insults doesn't get you anywhere. Oh yes, it gets you somewhere in the political forum and the media but that's because they're as narrow minded and lacking in substance as you are. If you can't clarify your point or stance without lowering yourself to the gutter of hip-hoppers or rappers (yes, I do insult them because they're, with a few exception like Will Smith, stupid, stoned, angry and violent punks that need to be in jail not with wealth for being such), then don't bother posting because I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person. Like I said, if you can demonstrate I'm wrong, then, unlike you, I'll admit it.

Lesson #3: Use logic and reason, not emotional appeal. We're already over polarized. Bush initiated it and now BO is waving the flames. I'm going to participate in emotional rantings that have no basis in the facts. That's what the left excels at and why people, like the tea baggers, are just getting sick and tired of it. Have something well thought out not flamed out.

Lesson #4: This is a blog, not a news forum so treat it as such. I don't claim to be a newscaster. This is a blog. A personal log. Many times I state some facts and analyzed what I think it means. I'm just expressing myself. If that gets under your skin, remember, it's just one opinion. It's not that I'm trying to impose it on others.

Lesson #5: Respectfully counter other people opinions. Many times I'm just stating my own personal opinion and those are the ones that get under the liberals skins the most. I find I get more hate comments from opinions that don't agree with their than any other. Now I'm going to give one of my opinions you liberals out there. I've concluded that you have no tolerance, as the group to that claim to be the tolerant group, for any other opinions than your own. I see more breed of contempt from the left and liberals by far than conservative. Again, just my OPINION from what I've observed.

The lesson I'm getting from liberals are they are not aid to their causes by their tactics. Many conservatives got a bit to learn but the most vile, mean, malevolent and hateful comments and statements predominately come from the left and it shows in their comments. I'll give a hint out to you libs out there. Your comments don't hurt, upset, and many times even give my wife and I a good laugh. When grown people act childish, it doesn't influence anyone but other childish people and frankly, I don't have the time, energy or even care about comments from childish people. Now if you can find me being childist, then state how and I'll respond. After all, we're all human and do silly things at time, but the left sure doesn't think so or that we need to be dominated over. Something I don't hold as I believe we're all capable to learning and growing and one thing I hoped to gain from writing online: the opportunity to learn and grow. It's not going to happen if I get childish, stupid, juvenile and empty comments.

Monday, December 28, 2009

The Underwear Bomber. Oh what a world.

As the facts over the happenings of the "underwear" bomber is now out, our head of Homeland Security perhaps makes one of the stupidest statements I've ever heard coming from a government official: the system worked. In Alice in Wonderland the Chestire Cat, being the devious being that he was, was making a plan to assault Alice with the logical reasoning you can catch a cat with a smile, but you can't catch a smile without a cat as he disappeared and only the smile remained as it descends upon her. I can't but help think of this as the whole response by the Homeland Security make their spin to adjudicate themselves from this fiasco.

First of all, Janet Stupidtono makes the claim that the system worked. The bomber was foiled and the passengers and citizens acted accordingly to end the threat. First of all, last I check, I haven't gotten my check from DHS. Oh wait. I'm not employed with them. Then why is she claiming it's MY job to stop these animals? Isn't it hers? Last I checked, DHS was created from the 9-11 commission for entrenching enforcement of our immigration and border security laws. Last I checked, security at airport security falls into the border security laws since from these terminal they are able to come here and enter our shores and lands. The fact that despite his father (HIS VERY OWN MUSLIM FATHER FOR CHRIST SAKE!) warned and proved that he was a member of Al-Quida and DHS just filed it away and let him travel here even to his father's amazement and without a passport. There's a word for this: INCOMPETENCE. She states that DHS can't prevent such terrorists and that TSA wasn't at that airport and it's not her or TSA responsibility to prevent his attack. Then why do we even have them then. If they can't even do the basic of their job, prevent a terrorist from getting on board in the first place, then why have them? Add the terrorist shooting at Fort Hood and her stupid statement, she should be fired from her position.

This all shouldn't be a shock given her record as Arizona's governor. Illegal Alien invasion nearly quadrupled, kidnappings from Mexican citizen with the drug cartel skyrocketed. In fact, AZ is the kidnapping capital of the country by far and it started with her governorship. AZ has been invaded by foreigners having people on US soil, some US citizens kidnapped and nothing was done about it. Still isn't. The state was also a financial mess. Should it be no surprise that her reign as DHS after 10 months has been a complete failure? She's a failure as a governor and as a law enforcement officer and not only needs to be fired, but should be looked into criminal negligence.

What's worse is that this plot failed mainly from luck. The wrong acid was used to detonate and instead of exploding, it just caught fire saving the plane. An underwear bomb had been used before and, unlike this latest attempt, it did work and exploded. One of Bin Ladens followers tried to assassinate the Prince in charge of anti-terrorism and after a ruse of a false surrender only to him, detonated the underwear in his home and only managed to kill himself. The prince survived with minor injuries. To credit that the system worked because nobody got hurt (other than the animal himself and one of the passengers that got burned while trying to stop him), it is a poor assessment. To claim success before the opposition failed is bad policy. You're relying on the stupidity or carelessness of the enemy for your success. Because the chemist for this dumb ass wasn't as smart as the other in Saudi is a bad reason to call this foiled attempt a success.

Think of what this is telling our enemies. One, at certain places, even a top terrorist state like Nigeria (only Saudi is higher, followed closely behind Pakistan and then Iran) you can get on board a plane, with no passport or questions asked, and sneak in explosive underwear. If it fails, the government will trip over themselves to spin it into less than what it is: terrorism. Now Americans will have the indignity of having our undies checked (but not Muslims, we can't offend them) and the airlines will have even more headaches that they'll want to avoid. As airlines are having enough trouble staying solvent, we'll have a new humiliation and inconvenience that will have us desiring to avoid them even more.

However, not all the news is bad on this. First, Janet is now being shown for the clown that she is and becoming a political liability to Obama by the left and right. She should fear hearing the sounds of buses now because the next one she may be thrown under as all those that become political liabilities have become with this President. Two, DHS is exposed for the incompetent agency that it is and it given the disdain by the American people by the events for the last 11 months, it's not going to take much for their to be a backlash. This is sure to become an election issue later in 2010 when the election campaigning begins with means even the left is going to have to scramble to make something happen other than the status quo. Third, this shows our enemies that we will fend for ourselves if we so much as smell a plot during a flight. That the spirit of Flight 93 isn't dead and that attempt to use airplanes as bombs isn't going to work like it did on 9-11. Lastly, it shows that Al-Quida is still a threat and BO's attempt to sugar coat it isn't going to change that.

The last two attempts to blow up planes has failed, but only because of poor execution by the terrorist. Though the American people will fight these animals, it won't do much good if these explosives work and the damage is done to the plane. As we can't do anything once they're dead and there's a hole in the plane. America has a bad history of reacting to past disasters and not preparing for a well known one. We need more to be done to prevent the terrorist from being able to make the attempt like profiling, better screening and better yet, search terrorists, not 80 year-old grandma in the wheel chair, Irish nuns, and babies. If we don't learn that from all this, then the war is truly lost. After it, our leader from DHS has completely demonstrated that DHS still hasn't learned that lesson.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Merry Christmas and hope it's not the last.

Seems to have been awhile since my last blog. Been busy with basketball officiating and Christmas that is coming up. Future isn't so bright either as I have more basketball and Jury Duty coming up as well. However, as I prepare for the upcoming celebration of the Birth of the Savior, it's occurring to me with all that's going on politically, that we could be coming close to the end of Christian celebration and I don't just mean the deathcare bill that's, of all the disgusting maneuvers, being voted upon on Christmas Eve.

The thing that got me thinking that the time of America being a Christian nation is drawing to an end is the anti-Christian mentality that is predating throughout our political and cultural body. Can't say Merry Christmas, it's happy holidays. Any reference to Christ is deemed a violation of Church and State, but not Ramadan with that evil Mohammad. Shoot, we can't even say Islamic terrorist any more. Or that stupid PC made up holiday that always starts on the 26th, Quanza or however you spell that stupid worship of vegetables. Public Caroling for the most part are forbidden. Most carols that are played publicly are neutral (anyone heard silent night, oh come all ye faithful?) mostly Jingle Bells (I'm ready to destroy bells because of the over play of that song), Frosty the Snowman or Rudolf. Anything related to Christ is rarely played. However a little known story that's getting little notice from the press should have all those who profess, and actually practice and not only on Christmas and Easter, to be faithful followers of Christ on edge for our safety.

There's a member of our military that is completing his college education that wrote a thesis about the ills of American foreign policy. He states that our foreign policies practice that of evil throughout the world and will continue to do so earning the scorn and hatred of the world because American follows the myth of Christian absolutism. Basically, the fact that Christian believe there are right and wrongs, good and evil that premeditates the evils of American foreign policy. He believes and argues that American is an evil empire because of Christian fundamentalism. That by judging others to be good, bad, right or wrong is wrong and hence makes us arrogant and destructive to other nations, exploiting them, like Iraq, because of the concept of right and wrong. To sum things up, he's stating that Christians and Jews are the only real evil in the world.

The seriousness of this man's argument as well as his statement can be shown in his political statements. He claims Iran is no threat because their President isn't a threat. Only because Christians and Israel Jews define him as such is he being deemed evil and a threat. That he's a man looking after his people and the Christians and Jews are making him a threat by being a threat to him because of our judgement of his action. Never mind that Iran has threaten to wipe Israel off the map. For you liberals out there that don't know words have meaning, that means he intends to kill every single one of them if he gets the chance. Now you liberals can make the claim that by my Christian belief that makes him evil is making me the real evil one doesn't change the fact that that man wants to commit genocide by the true meaning of the word and that genocide isn't evil. It just makes you a moron and an evil moron at that because once he's done with Israel, we're next. The fact that you feeeeeel or think that's he's a good man isn't going to change that. He makes similar claims over Castro, Chavez, Mao, Stalin, and Pol Pot. People who together are responsible for the murder of 100 million people and they're misunderstood over the evil of Christian and Jews.

What makes this man's thesis a real threat is that it's being accumulates over his incite and "courage" to bring out the "truth" of the evils and cult of Christians and Jews by the academic circles. What he says further is where Christians and Jews should be concern because we see it quite a bit in the political circles on the left. He states that Christian and Jewish absolutism as the one great evil and threat to world peace. That our beliefs in right, wrong, good and evil perverts our sense of reality and creates crusades (gee, which group put that word into his head?), murders, persecutions, white washes science like Global Warming (his words. He didn't use the more popular term Global Climate change. Perhaps he started this before the coldest summer and now winter has begun), racism and gnosticism. By making judgements, we tend to fight against those things we perceive as wrong or evil. True, there has been some wrongs done. The Southerns, for example, thought it was their Christian duty to "house and protect" the negro population since they were less than human like pets. However, it wasn't the socialists, Muslims that Obama thinks made this country, or the white racist artisans that didn't want their economic interests threaten by the freeing of the lower waged negro that fought politically for their freedom. It was Northern Christians abolitionist movement that bought forth the emancipation movement that eventually pressured Lincoln to finally decree during the Civil War to liberate blacks, at least as property to whites. What would moral relativist or the non-judgmental of today think? I'll tell you because it's going on in the Sudan and that's NOTHING!

Even though Christians and Jews have done their share of mistake, the concept of right and wrong had allow us to analyze and correct "wrongs". The Civil Rights movement serves as an example because Christian groups fought against it as they thought God wanted man to live within their tribes. The tribes being race. I left a church over this because they thought I was a race traitor for dating a Cantonese woman. Tribe in this meant local culture as to have something in common or a common interest, not conflicted ones like we have today with multiculturalism. Many, if not most, fought for the continue segregation of the races. However, it was a sect of Christians that felt, correctly, that the church's interpretation of tribe was incorrect and fought with the African Americans to not only not be property, but have the same equal right to opportunities as well. Try finding that with others, especially Islam that won't even condemn terrorism, but will condemn Israel and the United States.

As we head to Christmas with the most intrusive legislation ever to be written in the history of the country being passed and the final assault on our integrity by the leftist anti-Christian left begins, note that should they hold on this November and just keep both houses of congress, it could very well be our last Christmas as we know it. With their hate crime legislation, Holder and BO and company holding the executive powers to selectively prosecute crimes as they see fit mainly anyone that thinks in the Judeo-Christian values that found our country as enemies of the state. With the war against right and good in favor of promoting evil and defining evil as nothing less that divinity to the pagan state, we could very well be seeing our last Christmas or one of the last Christmas. How much that has changed in my lifetime where reference to Christ at this time of year was everywhere is now forbidden because of the likes of the atheist (Unless it's the evil cult of Muhammad) has deemed it evil to do so, nobody can even know the true meaning of Christmas. Heck, I'm shocked that Charles Dicken's book A Christmas Carol hasn't been banned yet. After all it has the true meaning of good will to men and individualism and charity and, GASP, reference to God. However it seems the movies based on his book have been. Can anyone remember the last time it was televised?

The gist is that good is being demeaned while evil is being elevated. Right is deemed as evil while evil is viewed as progressive. Worse, having any sort of judgment, other than bigotry against whites, Christians, Heterosexuals, and individual responsibility, is deemed evil. Never mind that making such moral relative judgment is judgmental in of itself. Right now, enjoy Christmas as we still have it now. Merry Christmas and God bless us. . . everyone.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Epitome of stupid II, Obama's Afghanistan speech.

Seems the saying that History shows that man learns nothing from history is being demonstrated by this either stupid or treasonous administration. When I heard, yes I actually listen for God only knows why to BO's speech, and I just in awe of what came out of the man's mouth. Not in awe of amazement, but awe of disbelief. I've never heard or even read such stupidity in the entire history of warfare or political posturing. BO makes Chamberlain look like a political mastermind in comparison. Let me explain.

First, Obama tries to speak out of both sides of his mouth. First commending about the Islamic fascist threat. Finally, the man mentioned the true face of the enemy. Then he mentions how that to maintain the fight and treat the threat that he (this man uses the word "I" in his speeches more than any politician in history and it hasn't even been a year in office yet) feels is the real threat (never mind most every military expert). So he tries to justify sending an additional 30,000 troops. So after all the grief and telling McCystral to shut up, he finally concludes that he was right about needing more troops.

Then he goes and makes perhaps one of the either stupidest moves or the most treasonous. How we need to withdraw and sets a time line. So, he speaks from both ends of his mouth, tries to appease both sides the table and now has given the enemy that he has determined to be such a huge threat a huge victory: a timeline. He's now told the enemy that if they can hold out for 18 more months, we will withdraw with our tails between our legs. Why send the troops in the first place only to have a mission of retreat and withdrawal? Worse yet why advertise it to our enemies?

Sun Tzu said a victorious general will seek victory and then fight. A losing general with fight and then seek victory. Basically, the objective, plan, and forces needed to win will all be predetermined before heading to the battlefield. A losing general will go fight and then define their objectives and make plans. This was the mistake Bush made on the occupation, the US made in Vietnam, and frankly, the mistake the British made during the Revolutionary War. However, Obama took it a step lower. He fights first then seeks defeat. There's no desire to win, no objective, other then to have he afghans take over and fight for themselves without any definition of what that is or plans of how that will be achieved and it won't. Now that they know the US is planning defeat and abandon them, they will turn and make alliances with their enemies against a common enemy now.

A general who decides quickly, consistently, and with reason is well respected and the men will fight for him to the death. The general that procrastinates, is indecisive and has no clear objective loses the respect of his men and the results is chaos. Which one does Obama sound like? A winning general keeps his plans as dark as the night. He tells no one of his plans so his enemy doesn't catch wind of his intentions. Obama just broadcast for the world to hear that he plans to cut and run. If you're the Taliban what will your plan be now? It's easy, hit and run and just create as many casualties as you can til they leave. As for allies, you're going stay away from this one because it's a lost cause. I like to know how he intends to get those 45,000 NATO troops. I guess because he's the messiah will be good enough. Pfffffft.

Had Obama took either fight to win or the fight isn't worth the costs and withdrawal, or basically took either fight or flight, I could had given him some credibility and respect. At least he would had been making a decision and standing by it right or wrong. At least that's what Bush did though most of the decisions were awful. Now, we have one that speaks from both ends of his mouth, trying to have it both ways, telegraphs his intentions, gives hope and enboldenment to the threat that he even defines has being real, and gives any allies every reason to avoid this like a hooker with HIV. It was by far the worse thing he could do and by far one the stupidest statements he's made. What gets me is most in the media don't even realized how much he's just dropped, fumbled, booted, and then punted the ball on this and in the end, this won't only be Obama's Vietnam, it will become his Waterloo.