Monday, November 29, 2010

Are the people of Portland just plain stupid or so anti-American they're willing to comitt suicide by jihadist?

Leftist never cease to amaze me in their hatred, stupidity and downright insanity. The people of Portland have demonstrate all of the above as they were a target of a jihadi attack. Again by a native born Muslim from Somalia, trained in Pakistan though need the lesson of how to weed out a true brother vs. the FBI as he got caught in a sting. I'm sure all the BS about Muslims being discriminated about the act of a few that seem to accumulating. If anyone pays attention to the Imam of the mosque that he attended, he didn't seem shocked, upset, didn't condemn his act, nor even deny that he promoted jihadi hatred. His big concern was going to be the Muslim backlash that often occur when one of their brethren commits a crime, mainly attempted murder if not down right murder. Again, it as an attempted arson in a small, unoccupied, office and nobody saw who did it. Ok, one thing, no infidel is going to enter one of these building of evil, not to mention that the Muslim attending aren't going to notice an infidel in their mist. Give me a break, they go ballistic when infidel are in a park with them or attend one of their "festivals". It's a bunch of nonsense perpetrated by the Muslims to make them out to be a victim of a hate crime when they are in fact the least victimized, other than whites who, by definition, can't be victims.

What makes this whole thing stupid and the leftist morons of Portland so clueless is that their number one concern is over the anti-Muslim backlash. First one, these people are stupid. This man tried to KILL THEM!!! All over because they were in the act of a Christian ritual of lighting a Christmas tree. He wanted to murder thousands and he's made it clear that was his attempt. This man has admitted that was his goal. What's worse, he has been asked if he feared that he would get caught and punished, and his answer was no. That the law enforcement of Portland don't investigate them as they have a no cooperation policy with the Federal government that they won't turn in or report on Muslim jihadist activities nor illegal alien activity.

So this man stated that the spinelessness of the law enforcement and liberal policies of the city made him embolden to pursue his jihadi goals of killing as many infidels, mainly the Christian and liberal fools that allow him to go on his merry way and attempt to murder them, and all the people of Portland, the people he tried to kill, is worried about is the consequences of those that support him, then I can't find a better definition of insanity and stupidity. Either these people lives, like Muslims it seems, is so miserable and meaningless, that they want to be sacrified by these 7th century savages, or just so stupidity and voided from reality that they think that they can't be killed because "they're with them". Either way, Portland, like San Francisco, deserve whatever they get from those animals and I for one no longer have any more sympathy for them.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Perhaps it's time to end the TSA.

The news from Portland should distrub us law abiding and sane Americans. Thank heavens, despite Holder's prejudice against the targeted victims, that the FBI foil an attempted plot to a public bombing of a public event, in this case a Christmas tree lighting ceremony. Though the FBI's record on stopping terrorist plots are spotty, they do have that they do actually FOIL terrorist plots as they did in this case. I still find it concerning that most plots so far have been foil by incompetence and luck, but the FBI can take credit for this one as they set up a sting and have this SOB left to right. What's becoming no longer interesting but monotonous is that again, it's a young Muslim born in a Muslim country, in this case the so called peaceful people of Somalia, and yes, the Somalis are claiming discrimination against them and I'm sick and tired of savages calling themselves peaceful to be honest, and was trained in Pakistan. This is becoming a broken record folks.

These incidences are making me think that the TSA has to go. The reason? Well, as stated, the FBI can make some claims that their interventions have actually encumbered terrorist attempts. I've checked the record of the TSA and do you know how many terrorist plots have been foiled by the TSA? No guess. In over 40 years, they still have yet to stop one attempt. Their record is a big fat ZERO! Not once has the TSA foiled a criminal act. The closest they've ever come was in 2001 when a head security supervisor wanted to hold Mohammad Atta, the master mind of the execution of 9-11, but the lawyers said that he had no right to despite all the evidence he had that this man was planning something but it based on profiling, and the rest, unfortunately, is history.

Now the TSA is have now invoked the most invasive protocols in its history. Heck, they get to do things even my wife doesn't do. What's worse is so many Americans are accepting of these new procedures. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for security at the airports. Without them, we're just giving an open door to those that want to do us harm, but the tactics aren't effective. Too many are making the claim that they rather be safe than sorry. Given that the TSA has never foiled a terrorist plot (they have foiled some criminal ones), how much safer are you really than you were before? The answer is NONE! It's all an illusion and many times terrorist have got on board. Just look at the shoe bomber and fruit of kaboom. If you think these new procedures are going to help, you're absolutely wrong. The chemicals used in both aren't detectable by any means. So these new procedures won't do a think to prevent them and that's what I find completely insane. All these new invasions of our personal space, in this case, our bodies and no better security than before. The news from MI-5, British Intelligence, is that now Muslim doctors are planting these explosives in Muslim women breasts and all they would need to do is bring a insulin syringe and inject the accelerating agent and you got explosive boobs and then what will be our new protocol? Mammograms, and since we can't discriminate against gender, men and children will have to take them too. I think Ben Franklin summed it up best when he said "a people that give up liberty for security deserves neither". What's worse is with all this stupidity and irrationality, we're giving up liberty and not even gaining an iota of security.

Monday, November 22, 2010

TSA-Totally Stupid & Asinine.

Listening to the fools that think we're either stupid or pooping in our britches over the terrorist threat at the airports are making some really stupid and Asinine statements. They're claim that all the sexual assaults, and that's what these new rules are, are what's needed to ensure safety isn't just flawed, it's downright wrong. Searching 8 year old boys, all under the permission of the father, like he had a choice, guarantee's safety on our flights. X-rays that expose all our glory in the name of security. If Ben Franklin was ever right, and I personally think he's not most of the time, it's over the giving of liberty for security that is the TSA. After all, they think the constitution be damned as it's irrelevant in the name of hiring fat slops that can't even see their own toes to inspect ours is just lunacy.

I've studied over 133 commercial airline disasters, of which 14 where caused by terrorism (and only included those that cause damaged, shoe bomber and fruit of kaboom weren't included). OK, think of that, of 133 that I could find, only 14 were by terrorists, and I'm only counting those that caused a plane to crash or be wrecked. It doesn't count the terrorism of execution like the 54 that were killed when a plane on a tarmac where killed during the commando raid (108 were on board, so half were killed during the rescue). So this claim that this BS is need for our security to fly is spacious at best because only 10% of airline disasters are caused by terrorism.

Let's see, of those 14 (and no, I didn't include the 4 planes by the 9-11 hijackers), how many where caused by white men with bombs. No, it's no zero actually. The only one caused by a white male was the first bombing ever in 1955 and it was a man that had mother issues and used it to bomb the plane to kill his mother. Other than that, no white men. Of the remaining 13, only one wasn't a Muslim. The one other one other than him was a group of Ethiopians (4) that hijacked a flight heading to Kenya that was forced to go to Australia because of their ignorance how aviation economics, thought all planes take off with full tanks and had fuel to get there. Instead it crashed into the Indian sea, killing 125 of 175 on board.

So, it's all PC running amok. Blacks (unless members of the Nation of Islam), Asians, whites, and pacific Islanders are all safe to fly with. They don't bring down planes. Only Middle Easterners who are males of age 18-40 are always the ones that bring down the planes. If we just profiled we wouldn't need any of this crap. I know, it's "discriminatory". Well, sorry to those Muslim that are peaceful, but until those radical elements of your brethren stop their evil jihadi attacks, as long as you look like them, you should be the one screens. Discriminatory, you bet yea. But I wouldn't want to ride a horse with a vile of nitro either. Those of us that mean no harm should be left the heck alone. Instead, we get this lunacy.

So when leftist morons say a child could be used in an attack, a child, even one raised by the evils of radial Islam, isn't going on a plane with a bomb without giving himself away. Let me check, number of times a terrorists used a child to detonate a bomb on a plane? Checking. . . . . ZERO! How many terrorist used old people on wheel chairs . . . ZERO! How many times they used a bladder cancer survivor. . . ZERO. You see, the TSA, under this racist administration, think whitie, blacks, Hispanics (even the illegal ones), Asians, Christians, Jews, Atheists, etc are equally likely to be a terrorist in the sky as a Radical Muslim. The facts don't bare this out, but when does the government let the facts get in the way of their policies to intrude themselves into our lives?

What's worse, the protocols are useless. Just ask El Al, the Jewish state official airline. They haven't had a Islamic attack on one of their planes in 35 years. You know how they do it? They profile, something the dimwits and Dhimmids here refuse to use or believe in. They interview those that give body languages and behaviors that are suspicious. The others they leave alone in peace. However, since we're allying ourselves with the enemies of Israel, we will not dare impinge on the sensitives of their enemies. Just US citizens. Let's note that one of the excuses to prevent an attack like the underwear bomber, better known as Fruit of Kaboom. Even with these new protocols in place, he would still had gotten on board. You see, the new measure can't detect the explosives used, no matter how much you touch the junk. In England, there's intelligence that Muslim doctors are placing the explosive in their women's boobs. Though the exploding boob on Austin Powers was a joke? It's not now and there's no way to detect the explosive, add a syringe for say Insulin and BOOB BOOM! We're dealing with evil, insane, but not stupid lunatics and they're smarter than the TSA (considering you don't need a high school education make most everyone smarter than the TSA) so they'll find way to get through, especially when all are being equated and no profiling is being done.

When you get down to it, the only really reason the government is doing this is to devolve our freedoms and entrenched more and more into our lives. An "Opt Out" day isn't going to do anything. If anything, it will just enbolded this socialistic government even more. If we really want to defeat the evils of tyranny, both Obama's goons as well as the terrorists, then give them no targets. Just stop flying all together or opt for the expensive private flight. Then and only then will the power of tyranny be curtailed.

Friday, November 19, 2010

Kobe being flacked for a commerical. Oh man come on!

Seems that Kobe Bryant is getting a lot of heat, and I don't mean the kind LeBron and company, about the cameo he did in the commercial for the immensely popular "Call to Duty: Special Ops." Man, I know the leftist hate guns and all, unless used by Muslims or Socialists, but this is just plain stupid.

First of all, why Kobe? Tyra Banks, in high heels even, was among the gun toting maniacs by these gun hating fools. There was some bad comedian whose name I don't know firing a bazooka. The point of the commercial is with the popularity of the game, you never know who you'll be fighting with, or even against, online. Somehow to make that now gun violence is going to increase because Kobe was in the commercial is just plain nonsense.

I'm not a fan of M rated games. I don't own any and haven't in 15 years (the last one was Duke Nukem, but the birth of my daughter had me change my priorities). I find most of them to be disgusting and morally reprehensible, but there a few that placate to the warrior instinct, especially in males. Games like Grand Theft Auto or Hitman. If it was up to me they would be banned because they teach and encourage you to murder innocent bystanders or targets, or even authority. Such cruel and evil objectives have no value and not really free speech, but the Supreme Court disagrees with me on that one. Call to Duty is about good guys and bad guys having it out. I think the core of this "conserversey" is the leftist hatred of guns and frankly of our military. They think all nations are equal. . . equally evil but we have too much firepower and strength. This game is where Americans are fighting against communist imperialism and this is really why the gun haters are criticizing this game are having their panties in a bunch about. They sure don't have issues about killing cops or prostitutes, or even playing the taliban against our soldiers but killing communist soldiers, that's evil in their minds.

Seems those that don't want to blame gun violence on weakness of character, lack of morals, or just plain the darkness that resides in some men's heart that choose to act upon their impulses rather than controlling them, but it's just easier to blame a machine or even a video game that emulate heroism even at the cost of the true horror of war. As for Kobe, I hope he takes it with a grain of salt. Ask them if we were being invaded or our innocent civilians are being massacred by Islamic terrorists what would they rather the people use to defend themselves: The ACLU, foul language, or shoot them before they shoot you?

Thursday, November 18, 2010

California is still batting zero politically. Now illegals to gain instate truition.

I've done many postings about the education system and its corruption that has basically sucked the life blood out of the system. There are many leeches that eat the blood from the system, the biggest tick of them all is the teacher's union. What I placed 2nd is apathy from the student and parents. Gangs are the biggest infestation of this apathy and the biggest members are of the Latino community since they have the greater numbers than the African Americans the two largest minority groups that do so pathetically awful in educating themselves. It's these gangs that the 3rd world keep throwing at us.

So imagine my lack of surprise and complete disappointment when the California Supreme Court, who keep to the same insane and suicidal mentality the other two branches have, deemed that illegal aliens are entitled to go to our university at the instate tuition. It comes as no surprise, but this is going to be the catalyst that's going to put the university system to 3rd world status now. It isn't like they don't have enough challanges as it is.

Before the invasion by illegal nationals that began in 1965, the same year welfare was passed and don't find it coincidental, California's education system, both K-12 and the CSU/UC system, weren't just one of the best in country, but the world as well. Now, the K-12 is a hopeless dysfunctional mess and the CSU/UC isn't faring all that well. Now we're going to allow illegal aliens with their 3rd world mentality, and don't tell me they're more American than I am or how we're a nation of immigrants when those immigrants of the past were legal and these anti-American foreign nationals waving their homeland flags (so why aren't they there protesting the wonders of their home country?) are going to flood our CSU/UC system.

Let's keep in mind our state is completely broke. It's going to be the first one to declare bankruptcy. We're already 8 billion in the hole and that's just a couple of months of a 3 month late budget and we're going to have to modify that already, and looking to be over 22 billion for the next fiscal year. Now we're going to add illegals to our secondary education system. With this "right" to attend as a citizen when they're foreign invaders, they're going to be qualified for financial aid which is hard enough for legal citizens to get but add affirmative action rules (they can't use race for admission, but you know they still do) they're going to be on the top of the totem pole for the state monies as well. Either we're going to deny more of our legal citizens and naturalized citizens admissions and aid, or the state is going to go deeper in the hole.

Not to mention what's this going to do to the political landscape of our university system. It's already anti-American, radical leftist as it is. Now we're going to throw the mentality of the illegal aliens? Our schools can't afford the students they have already. There are no more freshman status anymore, they stopped taking 1st, and thus, 2nd years students 3 years ago. Most, if not all, are transfer students. Classes have been cut 15% and many can't get their courses to graduate in time. Average time now in California is over 6 years to get a 4 year degree.

The court has used the legality that the tuition prices are based on a person's residency. Since the illegals are residing in California, they're entitled to resident costs. That reasoning is seriously flawed. If an out of stater comes to California to learn, by this reasoning, they're a residence by their 6th month. So they should only be paying out of state tuition, which in California is the most expensive in the country, for only their first semester, but that's not how it works. The residency is based on where their residence of orgin. Unless they full out move, get a house, California driver's license, basically having evidence that they're going to live here the rest of their life, then and only then does the residency status change and it's not easy to prove unless you live here all your life. Illegals residence of orgin is their home country, so by this reasoning, they got it wrong. They've made a special status for illegals because they can use the state they've invaded as their residence while the legal citizen can't. That's a double standard.

What's worse here is that this 3rd world mentality. This different strokes for different folks is what causes legal chaos in the underdeveloped world. Heck, it's why they're underdeveloped. If one was to ask me what's the most import clause in the Constitution, it would be the rule of law. Without the rule of law, all the other laws are meaningless as they can be changed at any time on any whim and that's what our courts with liberal activist judges have been doing for the last 30 years and this ruling a blatant violation of that clause. Illegals aren't following the rule of law. The fact they're illegal is proof of that. Why should a person that doesn't follow the law be allowed to benefit from it. This is the total antithesis of the rule of law. What next? Jihadi's right to take chemistry classes on our dime? Given that the rules don't apply to all makes anything possible and that is the worse travesty about this ruling.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Legalized Sexual Assault: The TSA.

The airlines better start taking a stand against the TSA or else they're going to go out of business. Why? Who in their right mind would want to go through what the TSA is doing to just to fly? I knew things were bad in the aviation industry, but this is complete insanity. The only sane statement I've heard in the whole carnival episode is that Muslims will NOT be getting a religious exemption. On that I can be thankful.

Other than those that must travel internationally, nobody is going to tolerate this invasion of their personal space just because the DHS say it's the only way to fly safe. As the illegals would say, TORO COCA! That means BULL SH*T in English. Israel doesn't subject their citizens to this craziness and they have active terrorists trying. They haven't had a terrorist bring down a plane since 1975. So what are they doing that we're not? One simple thing that no leftist will dare to suggest: profiling.

Israel, unlike the US, know who their enemy is and define them. They don't waste time accosting Irish nuns for they know they're not the terrorists. They're not going to grope the crouch of 3 year old girls because they're not the ones who put explosive in their undies. And if such an attack was to be attempted, there's going to be a plastic tube as the chemical needed to make that explosive to work must be injected. These X-rays and body searches aren't even necessary unless you're a pervert that get their rocks off doing such accosting. Lastly, they're not going to search old women in wheel chairs because they're not ready to meet Allah yet. The terrorist have won because they got our government so paranoid that they're seeing terrorists everywhere but where it really is: Muslim youth with Middle Eastern descent between the ages of 16 to 40. If young Muslims are offended by that, they can kiss off.

Now if I was to go grope a woman down to her crouch, I wonder what would happen to me, even if I claim it's the only way I can assure safe shopping in the mall? Gee, I think, one, the husband/boyfriend is going to beat me like a Pacquieo opponent. Two, I'm going to get arrested for sexual assault. Yet, it's legal for some ignorant and arrogant bureaucrat TSA pervert to do so for aviation safety. Well, I tell you, if anyone, TSA or not, think of going near my wife's or daughter "personal" zone, they're going to get my fist in their teeth and I don't care if I go to jail or have an IRS audit and judging by the reactions across the country, it looks like most of Americans don't either.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

It's the Culture STUPID! Not Slavery nor Racism!

There is a big hoopla about how from 1965 to the present that the illegitimacy rate has increased, but the biggest and most shocking gain came from the African American sect. They have gone from 24% to a staggering 72% and guess what they're blaming for it? Yea, no surprise, white bigotry and slavery. Really?

They're stating that the institution of slavery has taken from them the definition of marriage and family and they're too ill equip for such responsibility. The old "I'm a victim mentality. Granted that slavery had some evil and dark consequences for the country, and there would be some legitimacy, but that's at this point is nonsense as I'll get into later. They also blame economic suppression as being unable to fulfill their responsibility, mainly the infestation of drugs and imprisonment. My Lord, is there nothing these race baiters won't use?

MYTH #1: Slavery have made us too incompetent to form families. Using slavery for anything is just absurd. The institution of slavery, thankfully, ended in 1865. That's 135 years ago for those that have a public education. How after 135 years you still haven't learned to maintain a family is either just defiance of natural instincts, or just plain laziness. It's been over a Century since slavery ended. Nobody was bonded by their institutions, and thus nobody is a victim of slavery any more. Those that are being "slaves" do so by their own choice. Show me where people are property of others without free will and then I'll buy your nonsense.

MYTH #2: White bigotry makes it impossible for economic support of a family. Oh, how the flames of hate and racism encumbers progress. Behind women, blacks have had all the economic advantages. They don't even need to be competent to get a job or even keep it. They get all the advantages in college placements and social promotions within the education sector as well as the employment sector. For 45 years they had this advantage, yet the norm of them don't even take advantage of it, much less can excuse racism as the reason behind their economic digression

FACT #1: Black racism has done more damage than slavery ever did. The Race baiters are the true slave master of the day. Without the fire of hate and prejudice against White America, they would become completely powerless and broke. These race baiters keep the talent base and manpower of the black race in America to the lowest common denominator which keep them from progressing. Yet they believe they are the progressive when they stigmatize themselves from going forward and how does that differ than the slave masters that were defeated 135 years ago only in that now they are willing participants?

Fact #2: Black culture has kept the chains of slavery on their people. Want a sample, just watch MTV and BET tv and just look at the decadence and stupidity that are on these shows. They're all about Sex, drugs, and gangsterism. Nothing about promoting self improvement, or even a work ethic. Worse of all, it continues to promote the myths, lies and downright deception of the slave master race baiters.

Fact #3: American culture has desecrated the central culture among the entire spectrum. Ever watch TV or listen to the news lately? Go to a university and sample the brine they serve to their learning youth? Hedonism, socialism, bigotry, sexism and class warfare are all par for the course. The illegitimate rate isn't just increasing for the African race, but all races. For the white America, it's 27% from 4% in 1965. Just look at the faminazism and the contempt for family that are promoted by the media and intelligentsia. Heck, now there are movies promoting the joys and wonders of single motherhood. Why have a man when you don't need one? The feminist standard for men are so unrealistically high that shrinks have a term for it: The Lois Lane Syndrome. They're so high that only Superman will do (and frankly I think it wouldn't be enough because he's male). Got shows like Big Brother, Survivor, and others where the people with the least amount of Ethics are the ones that win and move on. Can anyone name a handful of media display where families aren't mocked, disdained or viewed as unnatural? Are we all like 2 1/2 men where the only man functional is gay?

The fact is despite all the government mandated advantages, the African American sect is getting worse and by their own hands and attitude. The rest of the country is following as now White America is where Black America was 45 years ago. The illegitimacy rate is now, overall, 31% and no culture in history has survived a rate that hit 40% and the rate we're going, that's going ot happen in our lifetime unless this is directed and as long as we allow the race baiters and perverts and evil people of our society to promote their destructive mentality into polices and continue our contempt for the family, we're going to join and if we allow it to get that bad, America deserves to die.

First T-Shirts and now this.

Any one remember the story of the 5 teenagers that were required to remove their T-Shirts on the 5th of May because it was the "Mexico's" day and were being offensive and threatening public safety as it was being seen as being "disrespectful" to the illegal Mexicans. What gall. Seems the Illegals got the message because a new ban in that very same school district has been placed on a 13 year old boy. Seems this boy like to ride to school on his bike but "public safety" is being threaten as some "students" were complaining. What was it this boy was doing on his bike to be so provocative? He had attached an American flag on his seat. Seems the illegal Mexicans were feeling threatened by the flag of bigotry on his bike and has requested that he had it removed. The school board, to no surprise since they cowered to them before, agreed. What is going on in California when a 13 year old is giving a nasty lessons in civics and patriotism by being forced to refraining showing his patriotism by displaying the flag of his country because of the bigotry by illegal invaders. No word yet if he's barred from displaying a Mexican flag.

Monday, November 8, 2010

Gifts for Guns. How foolish can California get?

Seems the Goveniator wants to put an end to gang violence. So, this man that claims to be a conservative Republican in hostile terrority in Hollywood, what does he do? The same old liberal cliche, he offers money for guns. There's so many levels of stupid, I don't know where to begin.

First of all, this has been done before and with no success. The reason is primary the same. Gangs don't obey the law and they're sure not going to give up their guns. The state is offering $10 for a gun that doesn't work. First of all, if they're not working, why does the state care? They're not contributors to the gun violence. They're offering up to $150 for assault weapons. Since assault weapons are illegal in the state of California, why would anyone bring one for a gift card if by the very possession of the said weapon can land you 5 to 10 years in the state prison system? Does anyone see the logic, or the lack thereof? Assault weapons are the prime rib of the gang world, so I don't see them giving them up for gift cards. The only people that would be interested in this are those wanting to rid themselves of outdated fire arms or those that are in such poor condition, that they're useless. Regardless, as far as the so called intent, it's worthless as only law abiding citizen will be turn them in.

The state is dire straits as it is. We're already spending $40 million a day just on those that can't find work here in the state. We're already $20 billion in the hole, which is a rounding error to Obama, but in this state, it's a sufficient amount of money. Now we're coughing up money to allegedly spend to rid gangs of their weapons? Hey, why not pay them not to commit crimes while we're at it. We're overspending on everything else.

What's worse, these guns will all be destroyed. This really make me question the motive of the state. It's no mystery that mainly law abiding citizens will the ones participating, that means fewer firearms for the law abiding citizens while the criminal and government gain more power over us. Crime is out of control, with the citizenry being more disarmed isn't going to make things any better. In fact, it's going to just make things worse and isn't that what this program is suppose to prevent?

Friday, November 5, 2010

News shocker! Government made cars suck.

Forbes has written on an investigation of the worse made and least reliable cars on the market. Shocker is that all seven lemons, the worse vehicles produced and on the roads, all came from GM and Crystler. One is run by the federal government, the other a European country that I don't remember. Is is no surprise when a socialist government with unions infested with members that are lazy, unmotivated and aren't required to produce much less construct a high quality product, top the list of the worse made vehicles? One got a 17 out of 100 (70 is considered the least amount for good). Hey BO hear this: Other than parasites and deficits, the socialist policies of the Democratic controlled government is poor at producing anything it attempts to create.

Can we now please leave that evil institution of the UN.

Just when things couldn't get more surreal and disgusting, especially from this administration, there comes this story from Fox News about the United Nations (of perverts and despostics).

The United Nations Human Rights Council, a conclave of 47 nations that includes such notorious human rights violators as China, Cuba, Libya and Saudi Arabia, met in Geneva on Friday, to question the United States about its human rights failings. Hey numbnuts, if it wasn't for the US, the term "human rights" wouldn't even exist. It heard, among other things, that the U.S. discriminates against Muslims like they are the pratictioners of what's fair and right. Let's ask the felon what he thinks of the prison system., that its police are barbaric And the stoning of rape victims and the vermin infested improvish prison by those member nations are humane? and that it has been holding political prisoners behind bars for years. Name one? Just ONE! Russia urged the U.S. to abolish the death penalty Yea, do clanditined like they do. Cuba and Iran called on Washington to close Guantanamo prison and investigate alleged torture by its troops abroad Are they kidding? They execute people for the slightest wrong. Just ask the professor that lost his hand because he dared his students to think.. Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, told the U.S. it must better promote religious tolerance The same tolerance these animal demonstrate in Tailand when they cut off heads of Christian girls or teachers?. Mexico complained that racial profiling had become a common practice in some U.S. states How is that a violation of human rights? After all, THEY'RE WHERE THE PROBLEM IS COMING FROM!.
Some of these allegations, and many more, come from Americans themselves You mean traitor, morons, and foreign nationals disguised as Americans? — especially from a stridently critical network of U.S. organizations whose input dominates the U.N. digest of submissions from “civil society” that are part of the council’s background reading Like moveon.org, man I can't take this evil stupidity any more.
For the first time ever, the U.S. came under the Human Rights Council’s microscope as part of the its centerpiece activity, the “Universal Periodic Review,” a rotating examination of the human rights failings and strong points of every country in the world, from North Korea to Norway, by the council's members Yea, I bet!.

How much longer are we going to tolerate this stupid and evil institution? If a candidate wants to have the White House for the taking, just promise to leave the UN. They would have most American votes and without the US dollars to support it, it would wither and die on the vine and we'd be rid of the most evil institution brought on by man. Thank god it has no military nor police to enforce it's demented ideals of "human rights".

Obama thinks party lost from a lack of communication.

For once I agree with the president. He's stating the Dems got a schellacking because of a lack of communication about his policies. He's right, but not the reason he thinks. He think we're too stupid to understand what he's doing and how good it is, in his mind, it is for the country. BO, the lack of communication is coming from you. When you love to hear yourself talk, you refuse to listen when people are telling you your ideas are wrong and have been proven wrong. There's a lack of communication all right. The Democrats refuse to listen to the American people, and THAT'S why they lose on November 2nd, and continue to ignored us, you'll see even a bigger defeat in 2012.

Americans got it right, California, as usual, got it wrong.

First of all, I like to say that I'm overjoyed that I was wrong. Wrong that the American voters will disappoint me and let the Marxist go unpunished for their crimes against America with the likes of trillion dollar stimulus spending that seemed to only stimulate Bill Clinton who's always stimulated when a pretty intern is nearby and the likes of Obamacare. American voters by the droves voted out and let the dictators know we won't go silently during the night. However, one group didn't disappoint and pretty much did what I expected of them by being stupid: Californians.

First of all, it looks like all our major seats will be held by the Demoncrats. Jerry Brown! AGAIN! They man was a miserable failure the first two terms he served here. I remember what it was like 20 years ago when he left. Given how things are now, it's like he's never left. Unemployment was 13%, deficit spending that today we haven't recover, our infected borders being overruned by the virus of anti-American invaders, and the one of the most hostile environments in the world. The only thing missing is a complete moron and lunatic Supreme Court Justice like Rose Bird, but give that time. Seems Californians have forgotten the long gas line, high interest rates, and migration from this state. Now with the illegal alien problem worse than ever, 13% unemployment rate, and extremely high hostility to business interest that the state haven't been able to attract one business from another, it truly seems like Brown never left and we just elected him to complete what he started 20 years ago.

How bad the invasion from the south is going to be. Brown won mainly because of the votes from LA by a million and everyone here knows that the illegals vote here. However, with Brown 70 years old, senile, crazy, and likely not to survive his term would mean we get Gavin Nussum as governor. As an illegal alien you have to be giddy because this was the mastermind of the sanctuary city policies. Oh yea, he condemned it late in his career in San Fran, but only when it was expedient for him in his desire for higher office. Don't get him wrong, he's all for the parasites and the illegal alien. With these two at the top position, we're going to be crushed by the interest in the Latino nationals.

Many of the ballot intitatives don't make sense for what they voted for the higher office. First of all, Californians voted for moonbeam but against pot. I mean if you're going vote as if you're stoned and stupid, why not make it legal? Never said Californians make sense or rational. They voted to end the 2/3rd's super majority to 50% plus one. With the legislature being 65% democrat, that means more tax and spend budgets (don't think they're not find a loop hole or an end around the voter approval requirement) so the financial health the state is dead and we're already 20 billion in the hole as it is. We voted to finally take redistricting from the politicians, but is it too little too late? The one that befuddles me is that we voted to suspend taxing business for green policies til the unemployment is 5.5% or lower. OK, California got a few things right, but since they got 50% plus one, wrong, California still got it wrong. Now with Moonbeam back with thing worse than when he left, Boxer gets another 6 years to send jobs to China so her husband can profit from it, and the same group of thugs running the legislature, the rest of the country will hopefully see improvement, while California will sink deeper in the abyss of liberal insanity.